Skip to content
Contact sales

Research · Case law · Court records · Legislation · Screening

The law of the world, in one clear view.

The widest record of judgments, court records and legislation ever assembled — and an autonomous research system that reads all of it, compares legal systems and cites every source.

Contact salesExplore Research
R (Miller) v The Prime Minister, Supreme Court · United Kingdom, [2019] UKSC 41, 2019
The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda, Hoge Raad · Netherlands, ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2007, 2019
Klimaschutz, Bundesverfassungsgericht · Germany, 1 BvR 2656/18, 2021
Obergefell v. Hodges, Supreme Court · United States, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), 2015
Google Spain, Court of Justice · European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2014:317, 2014
Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz v. Switzerland, European Court of Human Rights, No. 53600/20, 2024
Reference re Secession of Quebec, Supreme Court · Canada, [1998] 2 SCR 217, 1998
Mabo v Queensland (No 2), High Court · Australia, [1992] HCA 23, 1992
K. S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, Supreme Court · India, (2017) 10 SCC 1, 2017
United Mizrahi Bank v. Migdal, Supreme Court · Israel, CA 6821/93, 1995
Same-sex marriage, Constitutional Court · Taiwan, J.Y. Interpretation No. 748, 2017

01Research

Ask the law of the world. Read the answer with its sources in hand.

An autonomous research system that reads every judgment, statute and court record we hold, works through a question the way a researcher would, compares how similar legal systems have decided it, and cites the source of every sentence.

Deep research
Plans the question, searches, reads, checks and writes — for minutes or for hours.
Comparative law
Cross-references systems that share a legal tradition, so an answer in one informs the next.
Cited, always
Every sentence links to the paragraph it rests on.
Built to be built on
Fast semantic search, the corpus as a vector index through the API, task-specific harnesses — with zero data retention and your own keys.

Explore Research

ResearchSample
QuestionCan a court order a government to cut its emissions faster?
  1. Reading case law across jurisdictionsWaiting
  2. Cross-referencing similar legal systemsWaiting
  3. Checking every citation against its sourceWaiting
  4. Writing the answerWaiting

In several legal systems, yes. The Supreme Court of the Netherlands upheld an order requiring the State to cut emissions by at least 25% by the end of 2020, against 1990 levels1. Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court held the Federal Climate Change Act incompatible with fundamental rights for failing to set out reductions after 20302. The European Court of Human Rights found that Switzerland had violated Article 8 of the Convention by failing to put an adequate framework in place3.

1The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda FoundationHoge Raad · 20 Dec 2019 · ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2007
2KlimaschutzBundesverfassungsgericht · 24 Mar 2021 · 1 BvR 2656/18
3Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. SwitzerlandECtHR Grand Chamber · 9 Apr 2024 · No. 53600/20
The LexDino name set in the objects of the law — bound volumes, fountain pens, pencils, an inkwell, printer’s type and typewriter keys.

02The platform

The world’s largest legal corpus.

Research Autonomous, deep and comparative research across legal systems, with every sentence cited.Case law Judgments from the highest courts to the first instance and every tribunal between, as issued.Court records Cases as they move through the courts — parties, filings, hearings and outcomes.Legislation Statutes, regulations, treaties, gazettes and tax rulings — and the text as it stood on any day.Screening Sanctions, politically exposed persons, watchlists, adverse media, ownership and the court record.

From the first instance to the final appeal.

Every archive holds the supreme courts. The record that decides most matters is written further down — in district courts, courts of appeal and the tribunals most archives never reach: tax and customs, labour and social security, patents, housing and land, markets and competition, the disciplinary boards of the professions, military courts and the religious courts.

See every tribunal

03Coverage

The law, across borders. Open any jurisdiction to see the courts, states and records inside.

All coverage

04Screening

Know who you’re dealing with. At onboarding, and every day after.

KYC and KYB against sanctions lists, politically exposed persons, watchlists and blacklists, adverse media, enforcement actions, ownership and the court record — in one search, with the source of every finding.

Explore screening

ScreeningSample
Company · NetherlandsNorthwind Maritime B.V.
  1. Sanctions, watchlists and blacklistsWaiting
  2. Politically exposed personsWaiting
  3. Adverse mediaWaiting
  4. Court records, enforcement and insolvencyWaiting
  5. Ownership and controlWaiting

SanctionsNo match
WatchlistsNo match
Politically exposed1 related person
Adverse media3 articles
Court record5 proceedings
Ownership2 beneficial owners

05Solutions

The law, delivered the way you work.

API for platforms

For companies that build practice-management and legal software: the record, screening and research inside your product, under your name.

The API

Government

For ministries, parliaments, courts and regulators: research across comparable legal systems, in a deployment you govern.

For government

On-premises

The record and the research system inside your network — with a LexDino engineer on site to integrate, adapt and train.

On-premises

06Contact sales

Start with the record.

Tell us what you need to know. We will show you where it is written.

Organisation type optional
Interested in optional